Web3 is what you are on. If you are able to read this text and understand every word then you are on Web3. If you dont understand then maybe you can help me to understand the reason you are wanting to know more about Web3?
Who introduced this idea to you ? When did you first hear about it ? Well, in order to understand what Web3 is, you will first have to understand the structure and reason for its structure. Web3 is structured in a way that implements everything you can think of. An all in one website that has real human intelligence and real human interactions.
Web3 is more than that. Web3 is an open gateway for anybody that is web surfing or looking for helpful information that can benefit them in a positive way. Personal or private. Web3 can be centralised, decentralised, ecentralised, and digitalised. I choose digitalised. It sounds way better than words that separate the people from the government. I have nothing against businesses that want to decentralise but to me its sounds like Anarchy. I want nothing to do with it.
W3B, Web3, Web 3, Web 3.0, or however you may call it has a definition. Web3 is the worldwide web that has evolved over time with reconfigured technologies from the past and new technologies of today. Technologies of the past prevented us to have privacy but Web3 is changing all of that. Now you have a choice. In the past I didn't have privacy. I did not have a choice. I had to write in code with my own created cipher. I did not trust any one. You should always protect yourself on the internet any way possible.
Web3 has many definitions. You can create your own definition of what Web3 is.
Im tired and exhausted... Excuse me for venturing off my message. But anyway I have something I really want to say. I can say I created Bitcoin and the WorldWide Web but I cant prove anything because the lies are already written and the world believes everything they hear and see. They rewrote the date and times of when things were created and it just dawned on me that people actually believe the dates because no one is researching the facts.
I remember creating a laser mouse in 1991-1992 with a laser from a cd player and an old roller ball mouse. I did a few disections and a few minor mechanics with wires and connections and it actually worked. I sent it off as an invention to a well known company and they stole it from me. I never heard back from them until I seen an ad for the laser mouse a few months later.
Thats not what upset me. What really upset me is why would someone put on wikipedia that the mouse was created in different dates? 1998, 2004. Well somebody must know something. I made it way before that. Oh well I guess thats part of the decentralisation so nobody would ever find out.
Back in 1990-1994, I figured out a way to transfer data with a magnet.....Nevermind...Lets stop here. I dont want to reveal too much of what I did and who stole what. Did you know that it does not require a computer or hardware to mine coins? I created it so I should know. Whats so ironic is that some people already know this but their secret is a secret they will take to their grave. But anyway thanks for your time and understanding.
Web3 is great. Enjoy.
A Cypherpunk's Manifesto
by Eric Hughes
Privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age.
Privacy is not secrecy.
A private matter is something one doesn't want the whole world to know, but a secret matter is something one doesn't want anybody to know. Privacy is the power to selectively reveal oneself to the world. If two parties have some sort of dealings, then each has a memory of their interaction. Each party can speak about their own memory of this; how could anyone prevent it? One could pass laws against it, but the freedom of speech, even more than privacy, is fundamental to an open society; we seek not to restrict any speech at all. If many parties speak together in the same forum, each can speak to all the others and aggregate together knowledge about individuals and other parties.
The power of electronic communications has enabled such group speech, and it will not go away merely because we might want it to. Since we desire privacy, we must ensure that each party to a transaction have knowledge only of that which is directly necessary for that transaction. Since any information can be spoken of, we must ensure that we reveal as little as possible. In most cases personal identity is not salient. When I purchase a magazine at a store and hand cash to the clerk, there is no need to know who I am.
When I ask my electronic mail provider to send and receive messages, my provider need not know to whom I am speaking or what I am saying or what others are saying to me; my provider only need know how to get the message there and how much I owe them in fees. When my identity is revealed by the underlying mechanism of the transaction, I have no privacy. I cannot here selectively reveal myself; I must _always_ reveal myself. Therefore, privacy in an open society requires anonymous transaction systems. Until now, cash has been the primary such system.
An anonymous transaction system is not a secret transaction system. An anonymous system empowers individuals to reveal their identity when desired and only when desired; this is the essence of privacy. Privacy in an open society also requires cryptography. If I say something, I want it heard only by those for whom I intend it. If the content of my speech is available to the world, I have no privacy. To encrypt is to indicate the desire for privacy, and to encrypt with weak cryptography is to indicate not too much desire for privacy.
Furthermore, to reveal one's identity with assurance when the default is anonymity requires the cryptographic signature. We cannot expect governments, corporations, or other large, faceless organizations to grant us privacy out of their beneficence. It is to their advantage to speak of us, and we should expect that they will speak. To try to prevent their speech is to fight against the realities of information. Information does not just want to be free, it longs to be free. Information expands to fill the available storage space. Information is Rumor's younger, stronger cousin; Information is fleeter of foot, has more eyes, knows more, and understands less than Rumor. We must defend our own privacy if we expect to have any.
We must come together and create systems which allow anonymous transactions to take place. People have been defending their own privacy for centuries with whispers, darkness, envelopes, closed doors, secret handshakes, and couriers. The technologies of the past did not allow for strong privacy, but electronic technologies do.
We the Cypherpunks are dedicated to building anonymous systems.
We are defending our privacy with cryptography, with anonymous mail forwarding systems, with digital signatures, and with electronic money.
Cypherpunks ***write code. We know that someone has to write software to defend privacy, and since we can't get privacy unless we all do, we're going to write it. We publish our code so that our fellow Cypherpunks *May practice and play with it.
Our code is free for all to use, worldwide. We don't much care if you don't approve of the software we write. We know that software can't be destroyed and that a widely dispersed system can't be shut down. Cypherpunks deplore regulations on cryptography, for encryption is fundamentally a private act. The act of encryption, in fact, removes information from the public realm. Even laws against cryptography reach only so far as a nation's border and the arm of its violence. Cryptography will ineluctably spread over the whole globe, and with it the anonymous transactions systems that it makes possible.
For privacy to be widespread it must be part of a social contract. People must come and together deploy these systems for the common good. Privacy only extends so far as the cooperation of one's fellows in society. We the Cypherpunks seek your questions and your concerns and hope we may engage you so that we do not deceive **ourselves.
We will not, however, be moved out of our course because some may disagree with our goals. The Cypherpunks are actively engaged in making the networks safer for privacy. Let us proceed together apace. Onward.
9 March 1993
THIS IS A CHAT THAT WAS BEING TAKEN PLACE IN THE EARLY 90'S. A PERSON WAS INTERUPTED BY AN UNKNOWN PERSON THAT JUMPED INTO THE CONVERSATION EXPECTEDLY. ANALYZE THIS CHAT AND FIGURE IT OUT.
*The word May is referring to a person called "May". The full name is unknown at the time this chat was being taken place.
**We use the word "ourselves" to refer to us . We also use the word "ourselves" when We're referring to self and a anonymous or a pseudonymous character that We assume to be at that moment. Such as Clark Kent and Superman or Bruce Wayne and Batman. We can refer to using the word "ourselves" if and when We require to use it as a security mechanism against one or more person. The usage of the word "ourselves" is correct grammar given the situation at hand and when We use it to defend against one or more person in the act of attacking or threatening us.
***The word Write is referring to the name Wright. The full name is unknown at the time this chat was being taken place.
The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto
Timothy C. May
A specter is haunting the modern world, the specter of crypto anarchy.
Computer technology is on the verge of providing the ability for individuals and groups to communicate and interact with each other in a totally anonymous manner. Two persons may exchange messages, conduct business, and negotiate electronic contracts without ever knowing the True Name, or legal identity, of the other. Interactions over networks will be untraceable, via extensive re- routing of encrypted packets and tamper-proof boxes which implement cryptographic protocols with nearly perfect assurance against any tampering.
Reputations will be of central importance, far more important in dealings than even the credit ratings of today. These developments will alter completely the nature of government regulation, the ability to tax and control economic interactions, the ability to keep information secret, and will even alter the nature of trust and reputation. The technology for this revolution--and it surely will be both a social and economic revolution--has existed in theory for the past decade.
The methods are based upon public-key encryption, zero-knowledge interactive proof systems, and various software protocols for interaction, authentication, and verification. The focus has until now been on academic conferences in Europe and the U.S., conferences monitored closely by the National Security Agency. But only recently have computer networks and personal computers attained sufficient speed to make the ideas practically realizable. And the next ten years will bring enough additional speed to make the ideas economically feasible and essentially unstoppable.
High-speed networks, ISDN, tamper-proof boxes, smart cards, satellites, Ku-band transmitters, multi-MIPS personal computers, and encryption chips now under development will be some of the enabling technologies. The State will of course try to slow or halt the spread of this technology, citing national security concerns, use of the technology by drug dealers and tax evaders, and fears of societal disintegration.
Many of these concerns will be valid; crypto anarchy will allow national secrets to be trade freely and will allow illicit and stolen materials to be traded. An anonymous computerized market will even make possible abhorrent markets for assassinations and extortion. Various criminal and foreign elements will be active users of CryptoNet. But this will not halt the spread of crypto anarchy.
Just as the technology of printing altered and reduced the power of medieval guilds and the social power structure, so too will cryptologic methods fundamentally alter the nature of corporations and of government interference in economic transactions. Combined with emerging information markets, crypto anarchy will create a liquid market for any and all material which can be put into words and pictures. And just as a seemingly minor invention like barbed wire made possible the fencing-off of vast ranches and farms, thus altering forever the concepts of land and property rights in the frontier West, so too will the seemingly minor discovery out of an arcane branch of mathematics come to be the wire clippers which dismantle the barbed wire around intellectual property.
Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences! -- ..........................................................................
Timothy C. May | 408-688-5409 | Aptos, CA | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, firstname.lastname@example.org | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero knowledge, reputations, information markets, W.A.S.T.E.: black markets, collapse of governments. Higher Power: 2^756839 | PGP Public Key: by arrangement.
by Andreas M. Antonopoulos
B Money (Bitcoin)
by JC Martin (Satoshi Nakamoto/Wei Dai) 1995-1996
by JC Martin (enterthru.com:80)